Who among the following maintains that social structure has nothing to do with empirical reality? | Sociology for CUET by Vikash Ranjan | Sociology Guru

Empirical Reality


Question: Who among the following maintains that social structure has nothing to do with empirical reality?

  1. C. Levi-Strauss
  2. Marion J. Levy
  3. Raymond Firth 
  4. Evans Pritchard

Answer: (1)

The assertion that “social structure has nothing to do with empirical reality” is attributed to Claude Lévi-Strauss, a prominent French anthropologist and one of the key figures in structural anthropology. The correct answer to the question in the MA CUET exam is (a) C. Levi-Strauss.

Claude Lévi-Strauss:

Background and Influences:

Claude Lévi-Strauss, born in 1908, was an influential anthropologist known for his pioneering work in structural anthropology. His ideas were shaped by a variety of intellectual influences, including linguistics, sociology, and philosophy. Lévi-Strauss aimed to develop a systematic approach to understanding human societies by identifying underlying structures and patterns.

Structural Anthropology:

Lévi-Strauss’s approach, known as structural anthropology, sought to uncover the deep structures that organize and give meaning to cultural phenomena. His perspective was strongly informed by the linguistic theories of Ferdinand de Saussure, and he applied similar structuralist principles to the study of social and cultural systems.

Social Structure and Empirical Reality:

In addressing the relationship between social structure and empirical reality, Lévi-Strauss challenged the conventional understanding that social structure directly reflects observable social relations. Instead, he proposed a more abstract and theoretical conception of social structure, arguing that it is a set of models or systems that underlie and organize empirical social realities.

Key Points:

Logic Behind Reality:

Lévi-Strauss contended that social structure represents the logic behind empirical reality. Rather than being a direct mirror of observable social relations, it is a conceptual framework that helps make sense of the complexity and diversity of social phenomena.

Models and Abstraction:

According to Lévi-Strauss, social structure is not something directly observable but is constructed through models. These models involve a level of abstraction and are analytical tools that help anthropologists understand the underlying principles governing social life.

Relations as Raw Materials:

While social relations constitute the raw materials for constructing these models, the models themselves are not reducible to the sum of observable social interactions. The focus is on the abstract structures that shape and constrain the possibilities of social life.

Systemic Characteristics:

Lévi-Strauss emphasized that social structures exhibit the characteristics of a system. They are composed of interrelated elements, and any change in one element can have repercussions throughout the entire system. This systemic approach is crucial for understanding the coherence and stability of social arrangements.

Elements and Interdependence:

Within social structures, various elements are interconnected and interdependent. Each element plays a role in maintaining the overall coherence of the system. Changes in one element can lead to adjustments in others, reflecting the dynamic nature of social structures.

Illustrative Example:

Consider a society where kinship relations play a significant role in social organization. In an empirical sense, one can observe individuals related by blood or marriage. However, from Lévi-Strauss’s perspective, the social structure goes beyond these observable relations. It involves abstract models that dictate rules of kinship, patterns of marriage, and systems of classification that underlie and organize the observed kinship practices.

Critique of Empiricism:

Lévi-Strauss’s departure from empiricism reflects a broader critique of relying solely on observable facts in anthropology. He argued that a focus on surface-level observations might limit the understanding of deeper structures and patterns that give meaning to cultural practices.

Critique of Lévi-Strauss:

While Lévi-Strauss’s ideas were groundbreaking, they were not without criticism. Some scholars argued that his emphasis on abstract structures led to a neglect of historical and contextual factors that shape social phenomena. Additionally, the level of abstraction in his approach raised questions about the practical applicability of his theories in specific cultural analyses.

Legacy and Impact:

Despite the critiques, Lévi-Strauss’s work had a profound impact on the field of anthropology. His structuralist approach influenced subsequent generations of anthropologists, and structural anthropology became a major theoretical framework in the mid-20th century. The focus on underlying structures and the application of systematic, analytical tools contributed to the development of anthropology as a rigorous and theoretically grounded discipline.


In conclusion, Claude Lévi-Strauss, the proponent of structural anthropology, maintained that social structure has nothing to do with empirical reality in the sense that it is not a direct reflection of observable social relations. Instead, he emphasized the importance of abstract models and systemic structures that underlie and organize the complexities of social life. Lévi-Strauss’s departure from a purely empirical approach marked a shift toward a more theoretical and systematic understanding of cultural phenomena. While his ideas were not without criticism, they left an enduring legacy, shaping the trajectory of anthropological thought and contributing to the development of structuralist perspectives in the social sciences.

Take a Quick Sociology Quiz to measure your Performance


Frequently Asked Questions:

1. Question: Define the term “ethnic movement” and provide an example from India.

Answer: An ethnic movement refers to a collective effort by a group sharing common cultural, linguistic, or religious traits, seeking to assert their identity and rights; an example from India is the Khalistan Movement in Punjab.

2. Question: Identify the main objectives behind the Gorkhaland ethnic movement.

Answer: The Gorkhaland ethnic movement primarily seeks to establish a separate state for India’s Nepali-speaking population in the Darjeeling region, advocating for linguistic and cultural recognition and political autonomy.

3. Question: What was the Operation Blue Star, and which ethnic movement was it related to?
Answer: Operation Blue Star was a military action in 1984, aiming to remove Sikh militants hiding in the Golden Temple in Amritsar; it is related to the Khalistan movement, which sought a separate Sikh country.

4. Question: Mention a critical factor that triggered the emergence of ethnic movements in India, as discussed by Dipankar Gupta.
Answer: Dipankar Gupta emphasized that ethnicity is fundamentally a political process, wherein caste and religion, the key components of identity formation, are politicized by leaders for vested interests.

5. Question: What were the primary reasons for the Assam Ethnicity conflicts involving Bodo tribals and Bengali Muslim settlers?
Answer: The Assam Ethnicity conflicts primarily stemmed from issues related to immigration, land rights, and resource allocation, leading to clashes, riots, and evolving relationships among indigenous communities to address challenges.

6. Question: Briefly describe the role of the Dravidian Movement in terms of caste and societal structure.
Answer: The Dravidian Movement, led notably by E.V. Ramasamy, aimed to establish an egalitarian society, focusing on anti-Brahmanism and advocating for equal rights for backward castes, while also introducing reforms like self-respect marriages.

7. Question: Name the prominent ethnic movements in North-East India and specify one common objective.
Answer: Prominent ethnic movements in North-East India include the Nagas’ and Mizos’ struggles; a common objective was to gain autonomy and recognition for their distinct tribal identities and cultural uniqueness.

8. Question: What is the key argument of Gail Omveldt regarding traditional Indian society and multiculturalism?
Answer: Gail Omveldt opposed romanticizing traditional Indian society, arguing that hierarchy has always dominated it and dismissing the notion that multiculturalism is an intrinsic feature of Indian society as a myth.

9. Question: Briefly explain the social hierarchy factor as a contributing element to ethnic movements as suggested by Olzak.
Answer: Olzak suggests that the construction of hierarchies among ethnic communities, which often leads to the suppression of one group by another, is a key factor that can instigate social and ethnic movements.

10. Question: Identify one consequence of the unequal economic development factor within the context of ethnic movements in India.
Answer: One consequence of unequal economic development is the marginalization and underdevelopment of certain groups, leading to feelings of alienation and sometimes initiating ethnic movements as these groups strive for equality and recognition.

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques.


Why Vikash Ranjan’s Classes for Sociology?


Proper guidance and assistance are required to learn the skill of interlinking current happenings with the conventional topics. VIKASH RANJAN SIR at SOCIOLOGY GURU guides students according to the Recent Trends, making him the Best Sociology Teacher for Sociology.

At Sociology Guru, the Best Sociology Coaching platform, we not only provide the best study material and applied classes for Sociology but also conduct regular assignments and class tests to assess candidates’ writing skills and understanding of the subject.

Choose The Best Sociology Teacher for your Preparation?


To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques. Sociology, Social theory, Best Sociology Teacher, Best Sociology Coaching, Sociology Syllabus.

Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Syllabus, Sociology, Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Course, Sociology Teacher, Sociology Foundation, Sociology Foundation Course, Sociology CUET, Sociology for IAS, Sociology for UPSC, Sociology for BPSC, Sociology for UGC NET, Sociology for JPSC,

Follow us :




KEYWORD: -Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, Empirical Reality, MA CUET SOCIOLOGY


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top