The concepts of “Mechanical Solidarity” and “Organic Solidarity” were developed by? | Sociology for CUET by Vikash Ranjan | Sociology Guru

Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity


Question: The concepts of “Mechanical Solidarity” and “Organic Solidarity” were developed by?

  1. H. Spencer
  2. C. Levi-Strauss
  3. A.R. Radcliffe-Brown
  4. E. Durkheim

Answer: (4)

The concepts of “Mechanical Solidarity” and “Organic Solidarity” are fundamental ideas in the sociological theory of Emile Durkheim (1858–1917). Durkheim, a French social scientist and one of the founding figures of sociology, developed these concepts to understand and explain the dynamics of social cohesion and integration within societies. The answer to the question posed in the MA CUET exam is (d) Emile Durkheim.

Emile Durkheim’s work has had a profound impact on the field of sociology, and his exploration of solidarity provides valuable insights into the nature of social order, cooperation, and the forces that bind individuals together in different types of societies.

Mechanical Solidarity:

Definition: Mechanical solidarity refers to the social integration of members in a society characterized by common values, beliefs, and a shared “collective conscience.” In societies with mechanical solidarity, individuals are bound together by a strong sense of similarity and shared norms. The collective conscience represents the common moral and cultural beliefs that act as internal forces, compelling individuals to cooperate and maintain social cohesion.

Metaphor: Durkheim draws on the language of physical science, likening the social forces at play in mechanically solidaristic societies to the internal energies that cause molecules to cohere in a solid. The term “mechanical” implies a level of homogeneity and similarity among individuals in these societies.

Organic Solidarity:

Definition: In contrast, organic solidarity refers to social integration that arises from the interdependence of individuals based on the need for each other’s specialized services. Organic solidarity is associated with societies characterized by a more complex division of labor, where individuals perform different, specialized roles. Instead of a shared collective conscience, the cohesion in organically solidaristic societies emerges from the mutual dependence of individuals who function like interdependent organs in a living body.

Metaphor: The metaphor of an organism highlights the idea that in societies with organic solidarity, there is a greater differentiation of functions, with each part playing a unique role, much like the specialized organs in a living organism.

Now, let’s delve deeper into each of these concepts:

Mechanical Solidarity:

Durkheim’s notion of mechanical solidarity is rooted in the idea that in smaller, undifferentiated societies, individuals share a common way of life, values, and beliefs. The collective conscience acts as a unifying force, leading individuals to conform to societal norms. The sense of solidarity is strong because people feel a deep connection to one another based on their shared cultural and moral foundation.

In such societies, social order is maintained through the similarity and likeness of individuals. There is little differentiation in roles and functions, and the cohesion is primarily achieved through a sense of sameness. Durkheim used the term “mechanical” to emphasize the structural coherence of these societies, where individuals function in a manner analogous to the internal cohesion found in solid objects.

The classic example often cited to illustrate mechanical solidarity is that of traditional, pre-industrial communities, where everyone is engaged in similar activities, follows the same customs, and shares a collective identity.

Organic Solidarity:

Durkheim developed the concept of organic solidarity as a way to understand the social dynamics of more complex and differentiated societies. In societies characterized by organic solidarity, there is a greater division of labor, and individuals perform specialized roles. The cohesion in these societies arises not from a shared collective conscience but from the interdependence of individuals who rely on each other’s specialized skills and services.

The metaphor of an organism is apt here, as each part (individual) has a specific function that contributes to the overall functioning of the “social organism.” Unlike in mechanically solidaristic societies, where individuals are bound by similarity, organically solidaristic societies thrive on diversity and specialization. Social order is maintained through the intricate network of relationships and dependencies among individuals with distinct roles.

Industrial and post-industrial societies are often cited as examples of those characterized by organic solidarity. In these societies, people have diverse occupations, and there is a complex web of economic, political, and social interconnections.

Critique and Significance:

Durkheim’s concepts of mechanical and organic solidarity have been subject to critique and debate within the field of sociology. Some critics argue that the dichotomy between mechanical and organic solidarity oversimplifies the complexities of real-world societies, which may exhibit characteristics of both forms of solidarity to varying extents.

However, despite these critiques, the significance of Durkheim’s work lies in his pioneering effort to systematically study and theorize about the nature of social solidarity. His ideas laid the groundwork for future sociologists to explore the dynamics of social integration, the impact of societal changes on solidarity, and the role of shared values and interdependence in maintaining social order.

Durkheim’s work continues to be influential in contemporary sociology, providing a theoretical framework for understanding the shifting dynamics of solidarity in the face of social, economic, and technological transformations. The concepts of mechanical and organic solidarity remain relevant tools for analyzing the structures and functions of diverse societies, offering valuable insights into the mechanisms that bind individuals together in different social contexts.

In conclusion, the concepts of mechanical and organic solidarity, developed by Emile Durkheim, represent foundational contributions to the field of sociology. These concepts offer a conceptual framework for understanding the social forces that contribute to cohesion and integration within societies, highlighting the transition from small, undifferentiated communities to larger, complex societies characterized by specialized roles and interdependence. The enduring relevance of Durkheim’s ideas underscores their importance in the ongoing exploration of social order and solidarity in diverse and evolving human societies.

Take a Quick Sociology Quiz to measure your Performance


Frequently Asked Questions:

1. Question: Define the term “ethnic movement” and provide an example from India.

Answer: An ethnic movement refers to a collective effort by a group sharing common cultural, linguistic, or religious traits, seeking to assert their identity and rights; an example from India is the Khalistan Movement in Punjab.

2. Question: Identify the main objectives behind the Gorkhaland ethnic movement.

Answer: The Gorkhaland ethnic movement primarily seeks to establish a separate state for India’s Nepali-speaking population in the Darjeeling region, advocating for linguistic and cultural recognition and political autonomy.

3. Question: What was the Operation Blue Star, and which ethnic movement was it related to?
Answer: Operation Blue Star was a military action in 1984, aiming to remove Sikh militants hiding in the Golden Temple in Amritsar; it is related to the Khalistan movement, which sought a separate Sikh country.

4. Question: Mention a critical factor that triggered the emergence of ethnic movements in India, as discussed by Dipankar Gupta.
Answer: Dipankar Gupta emphasized that ethnicity is fundamentally a political process, wherein caste and religion, the key components of identity formation, are politicized by leaders for vested interests.

5. Question: What were the primary reasons for the Assam Ethnicity conflicts involving Bodo tribals and Bengali Muslim settlers?
Answer: The Assam Ethnicity conflicts primarily stemmed from issues related to immigration, land rights, and resource allocation, leading to clashes, riots, and evolving relationships among indigenous communities to address challenges.

6. Question: Briefly describe the role of the Dravidian Movement in terms of caste and societal structure.
Answer: The Dravidian Movement, led notably by E.V. Ramasamy, aimed to establish an egalitarian society, focusing on anti-Brahmanism and advocating for equal rights for backward castes, while also introducing reforms like self-respect marriages.

7. Question: Name the prominent ethnic movements in North-East India and specify one common objective.
Answer: Prominent ethnic movements in North-East India include the Nagas’ and Mizos’ struggles; a common objective was to gain autonomy and recognition for their distinct tribal identities and cultural uniqueness.

8. Question: What is the key argument of Gail Omveldt regarding traditional Indian society and multiculturalism?
Answer: Gail Omveldt opposed romanticizing traditional Indian society, arguing that hierarchy has always dominated it and dismissing the notion that multiculturalism is an intrinsic feature of Indian society as a myth.

9. Question: Briefly explain the social hierarchy factor as a contributing element to ethnic movements as suggested by Olzak.
Answer: Olzak suggests that the construction of hierarchies among ethnic communities, which often leads to the suppression of one group by another, is a key factor that can instigate social and ethnic movements.

10. Question: Identify one consequence of the unequal economic development factor within the context of ethnic movements in India.
Answer: One consequence of unequal economic development is the marginalization and underdevelopment of certain groups, leading to feelings of alienation and sometimes initiating ethnic movements as these groups strive for equality and recognition.

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques.


Why Vikash Ranjan’s Classes for Sociology?


Proper guidance and assistance are required to learn the skill of interlinking current happenings with the conventional topics. VIKASH RANJAN SIR at SOCIOLOGY GURU guides students according to the Recent Trends, making him the Best Sociology Teacher for Sociology.

At Sociology Guru, the Best Sociology Coaching platform, we not only provide the best study material and applied classes for Sociology but also conduct regular assignments and class tests to assess candidates’ writing skills and understanding of the subject.

Choose The Best Sociology Teacher for your Preparation?


To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques. Sociology, Social theory, Best Sociology Teacher, Best Sociology Coaching, Sociology Syllabus.

Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Syllabus, Sociology, Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Course, Sociology Teacher, Sociology Foundation, Sociology Foundation Course, Sociology CUET, Sociology for IAS, Sociology for UPSC, Sociology for BPSC, Sociology for UGC NET, Sociology for JPSC,

Follow us :




KEYWORD: -Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity, Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity, Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity, Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity, Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity, Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity,   MA CUET SOCIOLOGY


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top