Question: Who among the proponents of Kulturkreise School gave the criteria of quantity and form
- Schmidt
- Ankermann
- Graebner
- None of the above
Answer: (3)Kulturkreise School: Tracing Cultural Traits through Quantity and FormIntroduction:The Kulturkreise School, developed by German ethnologists Fritz Graebner and Wilhelm Schmidt, made significant contributions to the field of cultural anthropology. One of the distinctive features of this school is its focus on Kulturkreise, or cultural circles, as centers of innovation from which cultural traits diffuse. Within this framework, the proponents, particularly Schmidt, introduced the criteria of quantity and form as essential tools for reconstructing the history of cultures. Foundations of Kulturkreislehre:The Kulturkreislehre, or culture circle theory, evolved from the broader context of 19th-century theories of unilineal cultural evolution. Influenced by scholars like E.B. Tylor and Lewis Henry Morgan, Graebner and Schmidt sought to understand the development of cultures through a diffusionist lens. The core proposition was that a limited number of Kulturkreise existed, each giving rise to various cultures through the diffusion of cultural traits. Key Proponents:Fritz Graebner: Graebner played a pivotal role in shaping the Kulturkreise School’s methodology. His emphasis on the diffusion of cultural traits from specific cultural circles laid the groundwork for reconstructing the history of diverse cultures. Graebner believed that by identifying shared cultural elements, one could trace the origins of these traits to particular Kulturkreise. Wilhelm Schmidt: Schmidt, another leading figure in the Kulturkreise School, collaborated with Graebner to refine and promote their diffusionist approach. Schmidt’s contributions extended to providing specific criteria, notably quantity and form, for evaluating and categorizing cultural traits within the Kulturkreislehre framework. Concept of Kulturkreise:The central premise of the Kulturkreise School revolves around the existence of distinct cultural circles that served as epicenters of cultural innovation. These circles were considered sources from which various cultures derived their unique traits. The diffusion of these traits, according to Kulturkreislehre, could be tracked and analyzed to reconstruct the historical development of societies. Criteria of Quantity and Form:Schmidt, among the proponents of the Kulturkreise School, introduced the criteria of quantity and form as essential components for evaluating and categorizing cultural traits. These criteria aimed to provide a systematic method for assessing the diffusion of traits and understanding their significance in the broader context of cultural development. Quantity: The criterion of quantity pertains to the prevalence and distribution of specific cultural traits. Schmidt argued that the widespread adoption of a particular trait across diverse cultures indicated its diffusion from a common source, a Kulturkreis. The quantity of shared traits served as a quantitative measure of cultural interconnectedness. Form: The form criterion focuses on the structural characteristics and unique expressions of cultural traits. Schmidt emphasized that similarities in the form of cultural elements, such as rituals, symbols, or artifacts, suggested a shared origin in a specific cultural circle. Analyzing the form allowed researchers to discern patterns of diffusion and cultural evolution. Methodology and Criticisms:The Kulturkreise School employed a comparative approach, examining cultural traits across different societies to identify commonalities and trace their diffusion paths. Researchers would analyze rituals, myths, linguistic elements, and material culture to apply the criteria of quantity and form. However, the Kulturkreise School faced criticism for its Eurocentric perspectives and oversimplification of cultural diffusion. Critics argued that the emphasis on predefined cultural circles risked overlooking the complexity and diversity of cultural interactions. The school’s unilineal evolutionary framework also clashed with emerging anthropological paradigms that embraced cultural relativism. Legacy and Influence:While the Kulturkreise School’s diffusionist approach has waned in popularity within contemporary anthropology, its legacy persists in the exploration of cultural connections and historical reconstructions. The emphasis on identifying shared cultural traits as indicators of diffusion remains relevant, albeit within more nuanced and culturally sensitive frameworks. Conclusion:The Kulturkreise School, spearheaded by Fritz Graebner and Wilhelm Schmidt, significantly impacted the landscape of cultural anthropology. The introduction of criteria such as quantity and form provided a systematic methodology for tracing the diffusion of cultural traits and reconstructing the historical development of societies. While the school faced criticism for its Eurocentrism and simplification of cultural dynamics, its contributions laid the groundwork for subsequent discussions on cultural interconnectedness and the study of diffusion patterns in anthropological research. |
Take a Quick Sociology Quiz to measure your Performance
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. Question: Define the term “ethnic movement” and provide an example from India.
Answer: An ethnic movement refers to a collective effort by a group sharing common cultural, linguistic, or religious traits, seeking to assert their identity and rights; an example from India is the Khalistan Movement in Punjab.
2. Question: Identify the main objectives behind the Gorkhaland ethnic movement.
Answer: The Gorkhaland ethnic movement primarily seeks to establish a separate state for India’s Nepali-speaking population in the Darjeeling region, advocating for linguistic and cultural recognition and political autonomy.
3. Question: What was the Operation Blue Star, and which ethnic movement was it related to?
Answer: Operation Blue Star was a military action in 1984, aiming to remove Sikh militants hiding in the Golden Temple in Amritsar; it is related to the Khalistan movement, which sought a separate Sikh country.
4. Question: Mention a critical factor that triggered the emergence of ethnic movements in India, as discussed by Dipankar Gupta.
Answer: Dipankar Gupta emphasized that ethnicity is fundamentally a political process, wherein caste and religion, the key components of identity formation, are politicized by leaders for vested interests.
5. Question: What were the primary reasons for the Assam Ethnicity conflicts involving Bodo tribals and Bengali Muslim settlers?
Answer: The Assam Ethnicity conflicts primarily stemmed from issues related to immigration, land rights, and resource allocation, leading to clashes, riots, and evolving relationships among indigenous communities to address challenges.
6. Question: Briefly describe the role of the Dravidian Movement in terms of caste and societal structure.
Answer: The Dravidian Movement, led notably by E.V. Ramasamy, aimed to establish an egalitarian society, focusing on anti-Brahmanism and advocating for equal rights for backward castes, while also introducing reforms like self-respect marriages.
7. Question: Name the prominent ethnic movements in North-East India and specify one common objective.
Answer: Prominent ethnic movements in North-East India include the Nagas’ and Mizos’ struggles; a common objective was to gain autonomy and recognition for their distinct tribal identities and cultural uniqueness.
8. Question: What is the key argument of Gail Omveldt regarding traditional Indian society and multiculturalism?
Answer: Gail Omveldt opposed romanticizing traditional Indian society, arguing that hierarchy has always dominated it and dismissing the notion that multiculturalism is an intrinsic feature of Indian society as a myth.
9. Question: Briefly explain the social hierarchy factor as a contributing element to ethnic movements as suggested by Olzak.
Answer: Olzak suggests that the construction of hierarchies among ethnic communities, which often leads to the suppression of one group by another, is a key factor that can instigate social and ethnic movements.
10. Question: Identify one consequence of the unequal economic development factor within the context of ethnic movements in India.
Answer: One consequence of unequal economic development is the marginalization and underdevelopment of certain groups, leading to feelings of alienation and sometimes initiating ethnic movements as these groups strive for equality and recognition.
To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques.
META TAGS:
Why Vikash Ranjan’s Classes for Sociology?
Proper guidance and assistance are required to learn the skill of interlinking current happenings with the conventional topics. VIKASH RANJAN SIR at SOCIOLOGY GURU guides students according to the Recent Trends, making him the Best Sociology Teacher for Sociology.
At Sociology Guru, the Best Sociology Coaching platform, we not only provide the best study material and applied classes for Sociology but also conduct regular assignments and class tests to assess candidates’ writing skills and understanding of the subject.
Choose The Best Sociology Teacher for your Preparation?
To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques. Sociology, Social theory, Best Sociology Teacher, Best Sociology Coaching, Sociology Syllabus.
Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Syllabus, Sociology, Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Course, Sociology Teacher, Sociology Foundation, Sociology Foundation Course, Sociology CUET, Sociology for IAS, Sociology for UPSC, Sociology for BPSC, Sociology for UGC NET, Sociology for JPSC,
Follow us :
KEYWORD:-Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School Kulturkreise School Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School, Kulturkreise School, MA CUET SOCIOLOGY
