Who has divided the systems of exchange into three types’ viz., reciprocity, redistribution and exchange? | Sociology for CUET by Vikash Ranjan | Sociology Guru

Systems of Exchange

Question: Who has divided the systems of exchange into three types’ viz., reciprocity, redistribution and exchange?

  1. Karl Marx
  2. Karl Polyani
  3. Hobhouse
  4. Wiser

Answer: (2)

Understanding Modes of Exchange: Reciprocity, Redistribution, and Exchange

The classification of systems of exchange into three distinct types—reciprocity, redistribution, and exchange—provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the diverse ways in which goods, services, and values are transferred within societies. This conceptualization, attributed to scholars like Marcel Mauss and further developed by Marshall Sahlins in alignment with Karl Polanyi’s ideas, allows us to explore the intricate dynamics of social relations, economic transactions, and cultural values. In this exploration, we will delve into each mode of exchange, examining their characteristics, cultural contexts, and implications for the societies in which they operate.

1. Reciprocity: The Social Fabric of Exchange

  • Definition:
  • Reciprocity is a mode of exchange deeply embedded in social relationships and mutual obligations. It involves the exchange of goods, services, or favors between individuals or groups with the expectation that the parties involved will reciprocate in the future.
  • Characteristics:
  • Reciprocity operates on the principles of trust, social bonds, and ongoing relationships. It fosters a sense of interconnectedness and mutual dependence within communities.
  • Unlike purely economic transactions, reciprocity often involves non-monetary exchanges driven by social norms, cultural values, and the desire to maintain harmonious relationships.
  • Examples:
  • Gift-giving practices in various cultures exemplify reciprocity. The act of giving a gift is not merely a transaction but a social gesture that establishes or strengthens social ties. The expectation is that the recipient will reciprocate in a similar manner, creating a cycle of exchange.

2. Redistribution: Centralized Control and Redistribution of Resources

  • Definition:
  • Redistribution is a mode of exchange characterized by the centralization of goods, resources, or wealth in the hands of a particular authority or institution, which then redistributes them among the members of the community.
  • Characteristics:
  • Centralized control distinguishes redistribution from decentralized modes of exchange. A governing body, religious institution, or political authority often oversees the collection and redistribution of resources.
  • Redistribution is associated with hierarchical societies where a centralized authority manages the allocation of goods to ensure social cohesion and address collective needs.
  • Examples:
  • Taxation systems in modern states represent a form of redistribution. The government collects funds from individuals and corporations and allocates them to public services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. This centralized control aims to address societal needs and promote collective well-being.

3. Exchange: Impersonal Transactions in Market Economies

  • Definition:
  • Exchange, in this context, refers to market-based transactions where goods and services are bought and sold using a medium of exchange, typically currency. It operates within a framework of supply and demand, driven by individual preferences and economic considerations.
  • Characteristics:
  • Impersonality is a key feature of exchange, distinguishing it from reciprocity. Transactions are based on self-interest, and the emphasis is on the economic value of goods and services.
  • Market forces, such as competition and pricing mechanisms, play a significant role in shaping exchange relationships. The decisions of buyers and sellers are influenced by economic factors rather than social obligations.
  • Examples:
  • Everyday economic transactions, such as buying groceries, purchasing goods online, or engaging in financial investments, exemplify exchange. In market economies, individuals make decisions based on personal preferences, prices, and perceived value, without the expectation of reciprocal favors.

Cultural Context and Hybridity:

A. Cultural Variation:

  • Each mode of exchange is embedded in specific cultural contexts, reflecting the values, norms, and social structures of the societies in which they operate. Reciprocity is often prominent in small-scale, close-knit communities with strong social bonds. Redistribution is prevalent in hierarchical societies with centralized authorities. Exchange thrives in market-oriented economies where impersonal transactions are the norm.

B. Hybridity:

  • It’s crucial to note that real-world societies often exhibit hybrid forms of exchange, combining elements of reciprocity, redistribution, and exchange. For instance, a modern market economy may coexist with gift-giving practices within families or communities. These hybrid forms demonstrate the adaptability and complexity of human exchange systems.

Implications and Critiques:

  1. Social Cohesion and Conflict:

Reciprocity contributes to social cohesion by fostering trust and interdependence. Redistribution aims to address social inequalities and ensure collective well-being. Exchange, while efficient in resource allocation, can lead to economic disparities and individualism.

  1. Critiques:

Critics argue that market-based exchange can exacerbate social inequalities and commodify essential aspects of life. Reciprocity, while fostering social bonds, may create expectations and obligations that limit individual autonomy. Redistribution, if mismanaged, can lead to centralized control and power imbalances.

Conclusion: Navigating the Complexity of Exchange Systems

In conclusion, the classification of exchange into reciprocity, redistribution, and exchange provides a valuable framework for understanding the multifaceted nature of human interactions. These modes are not mutually exclusive but represent different facets of social, economic, and cultural life. As societies evolve and interact, the dynamics of exchange continually adapt, giving rise to hybrid forms that reflect the intricate tapestry of human relationships and values. Whether rooted in social bonds, centralized control, or market forces, exchange systems shape the fabric of societies and influence their trajectories.


Take a Quick Sociology Quiz to measure your Performance


Frequently Asked Questions:

1. Question: Define the term “ethnic movement” and provide an example from India.

Answer: An ethnic movement refers to a collective effort by a group sharing common cultural, linguistic, or religious traits, seeking to assert their identity and rights; an example from India is the Khalistan Movement in Punjab.

2. Question: Identify the main objectives behind the Gorkhaland ethnic movement.

Answer: The Gorkhaland ethnic movement primarily seeks to establish a separate state for India’s Nepali-speaking population in the Darjeeling region, advocating for linguistic and cultural recognition and political autonomy.

3. Question: What was the Operation Blue Star, and which ethnic movement was it related to?
Answer: Operation Blue Star was a military action in 1984, aiming to remove Sikh militants hiding in the Golden Temple in Amritsar; it is related to the Khalistan movement, which sought a separate Sikh country.

4. Question: Mention a critical factor that triggered the emergence of ethnic movements in India, as discussed by Dipankar Gupta.
Answer: Dipankar Gupta emphasized that ethnicity is fundamentally a political process, wherein caste and religion, the key components of identity formation, are politicized by leaders for vested interests.

5. Question: What were the primary reasons for the Assam Ethnicity conflicts involving Bodo tribals and Bengali Muslim settlers?
Answer: The Assam Ethnicity conflicts primarily stemmed from issues related to immigration, land rights, and resource allocation, leading to clashes, riots, and evolving relationships among indigenous communities to address challenges.

6. Question: Briefly describe the role of the Dravidian Movement in terms of caste and societal structure.
Answer: The Dravidian Movement, led notably by E.V. Ramasamy, aimed to establish an egalitarian society, focusing on anti-Brahmanism and advocating for equal rights for backward castes, while also introducing reforms like self-respect marriages.

7. Question: Name the prominent ethnic movements in North-East India and specify one common objective.
Answer: Prominent ethnic movements in North-East India include the Nagas’ and Mizos’ struggles; a common objective was to gain autonomy and recognition for their distinct tribal identities and cultural uniqueness.

8. Question: What is the key argument of Gail Omveldt regarding traditional Indian society and multiculturalism?
Answer: Gail Omveldt opposed romanticizing traditional Indian society, arguing that hierarchy has always dominated it and dismissing the notion that multiculturalism is an intrinsic feature of Indian society as a myth.

9. Question: Briefly explain the social hierarchy factor as a contributing element to ethnic movements as suggested by Olzak.
Answer: Olzak suggests that the construction of hierarchies among ethnic communities, which often leads to the suppression of one group by another, is a key factor that can instigate social and ethnic movements.

10. Question: Identify one consequence of the unequal economic development factor within the context of ethnic movements in India.
Answer: One consequence of unequal economic development is the marginalization and underdevelopment of certain groups, leading to feelings of alienation and sometimes initiating ethnic movements as these groups strive for equality and recognition.

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques.


Why Vikash Ranjan’s Classes for Sociology?


Proper guidance and assistance are required to learn the skill of interlinking current happenings with the conventional topics. VIKASH RANJAN SIR at SOCIOLOGY GURU guides students according to the Recent Trends, making him the Best Sociology Teacher for Sociology.

At Sociology Guru, the Best Sociology Coaching platform, we not only provide the best study material and applied classes for Sociology but also conduct regular assignments and class tests to assess candidates’ writing skills and understanding of the subject.

Choose The Best Sociology Teacher for your Preparation?


To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques. Sociology, Social theory, Best Sociology Teacher, Best Sociology Coaching, Sociology Syllabus.

Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Syllabus, Sociology, Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Coaching, Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Course, Sociology Teacher, Sociology Foundation, Sociology Foundation Course, Sociology CUET, Sociology for IAS, Sociology for UPSC, Sociology for BPSC, Sociology for UGC NET, Sociology for JPSC,

Follow us :




KEYWORD: – Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, Systems of Exchange, MA CUET SOCIOLOGY


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top